Supreme Court ruling weakens protections to defendants sentenced to death

4WardEverUK • 19 June 2024

source: Equal Justice Initiative

first published: 11 June 2024

Image Credit: Sura Nualpradid at www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net


In a 6-3 decision on May 30, the Supreme Court deviated from its own precedent and practice to uphold an Arizona man’s death sentence despite a federal appellate court ruling that his trial lawyer was ineffective in violation of the Sixth Amendment.


Danny Jones was accused of killing three people during an attempted theft in 1992. Arizona prosecutors sought the death penalty. Mr. Jones, who said his drug use led to the offense, could not afford to hire an attorney. A public defender who had been an attorney for only about three years and had never been a lead attorney on a capital case was assigned to represent him.


A long line of precedent flowing from the Court’s 1986 decision in Strickland v. Washington establishes that defense attorneys have a constitutional duty to investigate and present evidence of mitigating circumstances to the sentencer in a capital case.

But Mr. Jones’s lawyer did not investigate potential mitigation evidence until after the jury had already convicted him of capital murder.


He never hired a mental health expert and failed to request neurological or neuropsychological testing until the day of the sentencing hearing, even though he knew that Mr. Jones was “oxygen-deprived at birth and had a lithium deficiency—a condition linked to serious psychiatric disorders” and that “he was medicated for mood disorders, had attempted suicide and had been admitted to a mental hospital,” Courthouse News reports.

Mr. Jones was sentenced to death. On appeal, he argued that he had been denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed and reversed his death sentence, finding that the public defender’s performance was deficient and there was a reasonable probability that Mr. Jones would not have been sentenced to death if his lawyer had presented available evidence about his mental health.


Read the full article >

share this article on social media

Woman in a jail cell
by 4WardEverUK 26 July 2025
Too many women are being remanded to custody, including those who are severely mentally unwell, according to a new briefing published today (23 April) by the Prison Reform Trust.
A Monkey Trial: The Passion of Pauline Campbell
by 4WardEverUK 13 July 2025
A Monkey Trial by St John Mckay is a reenactment of the criminal trial of a real-life feminist activist martyr, Pauline Campbell.. but presented as a television game show. With talking monkeys.
Police riot sheild
by 4WardEverUK 13 July 2025
Interviews with police officers and internal police documents reveal abusive practices that have led to arbitrary detention and abuse of power in El Salvador, Human Rights Watch said today.
Wooden gavel rests on a book
by 4WardEverUK 13 July 2025
A public inquiry into the Birmingham pub bombings that killed 21 people must be held as a 'national act of conscience' and to ensure those responsible were held to account, an MP has demanded.
The White House
by 4WardEverUK 28 June 2025
California’s death row, the largest in the country and one of the largest in the world, has long been a symbol of what advocates described as systemic injustice, racial bias, and irreparable harm.
Eric Garner
by 4WardEverUK 21 June 2025
On Thursday 17 July 2014, Eric Garner, a 43-year-old father of six of Staten Island, went into cardiac arrest after officers attempted to take him into custody on charges of selling illegal cigarettes.
More Articles